We have generated angular distributions for 128,664 polarized and 153,459 unpolarized events for the reaction
a+2(1320)
0
+
+
+
-
Events are genrated using Monte-Carlo code written by Paul Eugenio, and then weighed using our implementation of Adam Szczepaniak's weighting function.
Events are generated polarized in the lab frame. We then rotate to the Gottfried-Jackson frame and define
to be the angle between the polarization and the normal to the production plane. We expect these angular distributions for polarized photons to demonstrate the
dependence discussed in Curtis Meyer's calculations, namely:
cos(2
)-
sin(2
)
where
is the real part and
is the imaginary part of the off-diagonal elements in the density matrix of the a+2(1320). In the case where the photon beam is unpolarized,
and
are both zero so the distributions should be flat. Looking at
for
= near 0, 180o corresponds to choosing
=0. Looking at
for
near 90o corresponds to setting
=0.
Plots of
+
+
- invariant mass, 
invariant mass, |t|, and |t| vs.
+
+
- invariant mas are shown without cuts.

In the angular distributions, we first plot
vs
, then
for events having
near 0, 180o and also
for
near 90o. The polarized data demonstrates the predicted
dependence. The only cuts used in these distributions are those on
, as indicated above the last two columns.
To further enhance the
depencence, we show these same angular distributions with a 200 MeV wide
mass cut (670 MeV to 8709 MeV) on the appropriate two pion invariant mass.
and cos
distributions are shown below. The only applied cuts are on those indicated on
.
The cos
distributions are repeated with the addition of a
mass cut.
Distributions of the helicity angles are shown below. No cuts are applied.

Distributions of
for events satisfying the indicated cuts on
are flat as expected. Again, no cuts are applied, except those stated above the last two columns.

We show these same angular distributions with a 200 MeV wide
mass cut (670 MeV to 8709 MeV) on the appropriate two pion invariant mass. No other new cuts are applied.
and cos
distributions are shown below. The only applied cuts are on those indicated on
.
The cos
distributions are repeated with the addition of a
mass cut.
Distributions of the helicity angles are shown below. No cuts are applied.